The End of a Civilization: Far Cry 5

A basic premise of literary analysis is that whatever becomes truly popular in a given society reveals much about the underlying moral values of that society. This is how we can discern so much about the Ancient Near East (ANE); we read their literature and gather clues about their philosophical assumptions regarding reality and what they felt was good and right.

On the other hand, it’s notably obvious that a great deal of artistic output is meant to influence. It’s an attempt to inculcate values the artist wishes their world held. There’s a great deal of entertainment output that cynically reflects attempts to give the audience what it already wants. Then again, sometimes that mass-produced crap masks an ulterior motive. It’s aimed at taking advantage of the lowest common denominator to subtly condition the audience to various ends.

We know this because too often the folks behind entertainment have openly admitted such designs. Their flashes of honesty give us clues for when other producers aren’t so honest. Some of you may know that I don’t like playing video games, but that I do like to watch others play them. I especially like well crafted games that offer grand landscapes, the so-called “open world” games where the player isn’t herded along specific paths. The artists behind open world games invest an awful lot of time and creative energy in producing believable worlds that call you to explore. Such games answer a very human call to adventure.

But if there’s any part of the video game industry that suffers, it’s the scripting and storytelling that is often most disappointing. It seems as if the game business suffers a common malady, in that the producers are forced to choose between good visuals and play, or good story lines, but cannot offer both.

Recently, I watched a game walkthrough that I found deeply disturbing: Far Cry 5. The open world part was inspiring. Granted, some of the game play was entirely too chaotic with random attacks that were simply too much for enjoyable play, but that’s a matter of taste for a lot of players. What was most disturbing was the shocking nihilism in the underlying story.

It’s a very ugly sucker punch in that respect. You are drawn into playing based on traditional gamer values of finding a worthy cause for which to sneak, snipe and attack the bad guys. But at the end of the game, you lose for embracing that. There are three possible endings. The first is simply don’t play — don’t arrest the chief villain, just let him go on about his evil ways and you’ll get the “good” ending.

If you engage the story at all, you must lose. In fact, you should have been forewarned at several points in the game where you are captured and tormented in ways that make absolutely no sense at all. Your gaming skills mean nothing at all, and the game itself betrays you senselessly. But in the final showdown, you lose no matter which of two options you choose.

If you don’t take the bad guy down, you still have to face the results of mind-manipulating conditioning where you end up murdering your associates (though it’s only hinted at). If you to take him down, you’ll be told he was right all along and the story ends in the nuclear holocaust he predicted, with the player forced to spend the rest of their lives locked in a bunker with the evil monster.

Meanwhile, the rest of the game play is marred by some of the most outrageous SJW snowflaking. There are no real social conservatives in the game; almost everyone is an extreme caricature of conservative rural American values. The bad guy is actually the good guy, because he’s not racist or sexist, nor any of the other characteristic evil traits trumpeted by the social left. Best of all is that he is wholly anti-mainstream. Thus, all the things you are encouraged to fight in the game are reduced to a matter of taste. The game is not at all subtle by turning things upside down, mocking any hint of conservative social values. The bad guy brainwashes his minions, sometimes using drugs. He tortures and manipulates; he steals and kills at will and seeks most of all to make people miserable by any means possible if they don’t submit. But in the end, he was right — or so the game wants you to believe.

Meanwhile, the game was introduced with great marketing fanfare in which the promoters soberly insisted it offers a new level of serious moral high ground. The whole thing was a head-game from the start. This is not cool and edgy; it’s a bewildering attack on everything that gamers hold sacred. You get the feeling that, if the producers could, they would have bombed religious buildings and dumped mind-altering substances in the public water supply, but couldn’t afford it, so they confined the action to a game that would surely piss-off all but the most idiotic players. Oh, and the SJW snowflakes would, of course, love it, too.

I’m not defending Western morals, either conservative or liberal. It’s crazy to me how both sides of this false divide don’t realize they come from the same moral morass, that they are two essential halves of the same failed value system. But when something like a game attacks this viciously one side or the other, it shows just how far Western culture has come into its final death throes. The nuclear holocaust at the end of the game is symbolic of how willing one side is to destroy everything to keep the other side from even existing. People don’t matter, only some impossible social orthodoxy.

(For random gamers who stumble across this post: I will permit countering opinions, but I only if I deem them on-topic. Try to grasp the context of this blog and don’t waste time with pointless noise. I admit up front that I’m not a gamer, and this is not a gamer blog.)

About Ed Hurst

Disabled Veteran, prophet of God's Laws, Bible History teacher, wannabe writer, volunteer computer technician, cyclist, Social Science researcher
This entry was posted in social sciences and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The End of a Civilization: Far Cry 5

  1. wildcucumber says:

    After reading this post I spotted reviews of the game elsewhere. I would normally have ignored them, but thought, “what the heck, let’s see”. Here’s the one I read, for anyone interested.

    But it begins with this line: “I enjoyed myself for the vast majority of Far Cry 5. Ubisoft Montreal made an extremely fun sandbox and loaded it with all sorts of wacky tools of destruction.”

    That sort of talk just creeps me the hell out. “Fun sandbox”? “Wacky tools of destruction”?

    What a waste of young (mostly but not all) male potential “gaming culture” seems. My sons had their fun with these games, then when they hit their mid teens they got up off the couch and headed into the world to make their mark. Many more do not. I don’t see these games as harmless, I see them as indoctrination, addiction and ultimately as destructive to the psyche as drugs.

    You know, I understand the need for adventure. But there’s so much available in real life that could involve *making the world a better place*, rather than staring at a screen pretending to kill monsters and other human beings. I have yet to hear a convincing argument in their favour.


  2. Ed Hurst says:

    This is my calling. I agree with you about how awful the gamer culture is. Unfortunately, they are our future, and some current, social movers and shakers. Whether the games shape their values, their values shape the market, or a mixture of things, if we don’t pay attention to where this bunch of people are headed, we won’t understand how things are going to turn out. I feel a burden to know what shapes them, along with a burden to criticize it prophetically.


  3. wildcucumber says:

    Maybe the best we can do is be here to welcome them if/when they begin to wake up. I’m as much sad for them as I am alarmed.


  4. Jay DiNitto says:

    Huh. A year or so ago I had gotten FC 2 (I think) from a friend who was giving away old games he didn’t play. It had interesting mechanics, like weapons jamming or breaking down, but the storyline didn’t interest me at all, so I never bothered with it.

    Part of the appeal of these games, in terms of broad psychological factors, is that they can provide some neural chemical rewards with little to no risk. A lot of men are finding high risk-uncertain reward tradeoffs in real life, so it’s no wonder some men (it’s mostly men) find it easier and more rewarding to get immersed.


  5. Ed Hurst says:

    Good insight, Jay. While I like watching them a little, it’s rare I can stay with watching anything like that for anywhere near as long as most players can play. But then, I had my real adventures and those are far more addictive to me.


  6. Iain says:

    The only game I’ve ever played all the way through was Grand Theft Auto 5 my son bought it for his PS4. I had fun, I mean I got to do things that would kill you or send you to prison for life. It’s just harmless fun. When I was a kid we played outside and did genuinely dangerous things, like imitating Evel Knievel on bicycles, kids got broken bones and concussions regularly. I can’t count the times I got busted up just playing! Our parents didn’t mind because we were outside in fresh air and accidents were par for the course. My kids have never had the experience of climbing to the top of a 60ft tree then stepping unto a dead branch on the way down and falling 30ft getting smacked around hard before hitting the ground with air knocked out of me, only to climb back up because I wasn’t about to give in to damned ole tree.
    So on the whole I’d say these dumb video games are a whole lot safer than what I did as a kid.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.